A Democracy Drive Thread

Punishing the Law Firms

Executive orders stripping security clearances and federal access from law firms that represented Trump’s opponents, and the firms that paid hundreds of millions in free legal work to make the threat go away.

In early 2025 Trump began signing executive orders against individual law firms because of who they had represented or employed: firms tied to the Mueller investigation, the Manhattan DA’s case, Hillary Clinton’s campaign and Dominion’s defamation suit against Fox. The orders cut off security clearances, barred lawyers from federal buildings and pressured clients with government contracts to leave. Courts struck down every order that was challenged as unconstitutional retaliation. But several of the largest firms settled first, pledging close to a billion dollars in free legal work for causes the president chose. This thread tracks it in order, with sources.

7 entries Feb 2025 → Dec 2025 Every entry is sourced & links back to the archive.
2025

February 25, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump suspends the security clearances of lawyers at the Washington firm Covington & Burling who represented former special counsel Jack Smith in his personal capacity

A presidential memo suspended clearances held by Peter Koski and all Covington lawyers and staff “who assisted former Special Counsel Jack Smith.” Covington said it represented Smith after it became apparent he would become the subject of a government investigation. It was the first of a series of orders punishing law firms for their clients and lawyers.

Everyone has a right to a lawyer, and lawyers cannot be punished for whom they represent. Retaliating against a firm for defending the prosecutor who charged the president is meant to make other lawyers afraid to take on clients the president dislikes.
Cross-posted · also in: The Revenge Prosecutions

March 6, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump signs an executive order against the law firm Perkins Coie, stripping its lawyers’ security clearances, barring them from federal buildings and pushing government contractors to drop the firm, which had represented Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign

Days later he told Fox News, “We have a lot of law firms that we’re going to be going after, because they were very dishonest people.” Legal experts told NPR there was no precedent for a president punishing firms over the clients they represent. On May 2, 2025, Judge Beryl Howell struck the order down as unconstitutional, writing that “no American President has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue.”

“We have a lot of law firms that we’re going to be going after, because they were very dishonest people.”
Everyone has a right to a lawyer, and lawyers must be free to take clients the government dislikes. Punishing a firm for whom it represented is meant to scare every firm away from representing the president’s opponents. The court ruling came after the intimidation had already worked on other firms.
Sources: MSNBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · NPR ↗

March 20, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump rescinds his executive order against Paul, Weiss after its chairman, Brad Karp, meets him and agrees to $40 million in free legal work for causes the administration chooses and to drop diversity hiring

The order had singled out former Paul, Weiss lawyer Mark Pomerantz, who worked on the Manhattan DA’s investigation of Trump’s finances. The firm pledged pro bono help for veterans, the president’s antisemitism task force and “fairness in the Justice System.”

A law firm paid the president, in the form of free legal services, to have a punishment lifted. That turns executive orders into a tool for extracting concessions from private companies.

April 9, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump signs an executive order against Susman Godfrey, the firm that won Dominion Voting Systems’ $787.5 million settlement from Fox News over 2020 election lies, revoking clearances and banning its lawyers from federal buildings

The order accused the firm of “weaponizing the American legal system and degrading the quality of American elections.” On June 27, 2025, Judge Loren AliKhan permanently blocked it as illegal First Amendment retaliation that “threatens the independence of the bar,” making her the fourth judge to strike down one of these orders.

The firm’s offense was winning a defamation case over the president’s own election lie. Every court that heard these orders called them retaliation, but each one stayed in force until a judge stopped it.

April 11, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump announces that five more of the largest U.S. law firms, including Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins and Simpson Thacher, will provide at least $600 million in free legal work for causes he supports

Four firms pledged $125 million each, and Cadwalader pledged $100 million. Like earlier deals, the work goes to the president’s chosen causes, such as veterans, combating antisemitism and “fairness in our Justice System.”

These firms were not even under executive orders. They paid in advance to avoid becoming targets, which shows how effective the threat was.
Sources: CNBC ↗ · NBC DFW ↗

April 24, 2025

On the ground

Trump Hours after Trump demands his company get “rid of him ASAP,” the Trump Organization fires its ethics adviser, William Burck, for representing Harvard against the administration

Eric Trump called it a “conflict.” Burck had been hired in January to review the company’s major deals.

The president punished a lawyer for representing a client suing his administration, using his family business.

December 10, 2025

On the ground

An apparent ICE roster of immigration attorneys — overwhelmingly lawyers with Latino, Asian or African names — is found buried on ICE’s website and pulled after a lawyer discovers her own name on it

An apparent ICE roster of immigration attorneys is found buried on ICE’s website and pulled after a lawyer discovers her own name on it. The list was made up overwhelmingly of lawyers with Latino, Asian or African-sounding names. The advocacy group Al Otro Lado filed a records request demanding to know who created it and why.

A March 2025 White House memo had accused immigration attorneys of “unscrupulous” conduct and ordered agencies to seek sanctions against lawyers suing the government.
Cross-posted · also in: ICE Unleashed