A Democracy Drive Thread

The Revenge Prosecutions

Turning the Justice Department against the people who investigated and prosecuted him — indictments brought by a loyalist with no prosecutorial experience, then thrown out as unlawful.

After returning to office, the president directed the machinery of federal law enforcement at the very people who had investigated or prosecuted him — former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and former special counsel Jack Smith. This thread tracks that campaign in chronological order, with sources: the public demands for prosecution, the removal of a U.S. attorney who declined to bring charges and his replacement with a loyalist, the indictments that followed, and the courts and grand juries that threw them out. The entries are presented in order so the sequence speaks for itself.

74 entries Sep 2024 → Oct 2026 Every entry is sourced & links back to the archive.
2024

September 27, 2024

In his own words

Trump As a candidate, Trump threatens to have Google prosecuted “at the maximum levels” if he wins, claiming its search results showed “bad stories” about him and good ones about Kamala Harris

Citing a conservative group’s report about one search term on one day, Trump posted that Google “has illegally used a system of only revealing and displaying bad stories about Donald J. Trump” and that he would “request their prosecution, at the maximum levels, when I win the Election.” Google said both campaigns’ sites appeared at the top of relevant searches.

“I will request their prosecution, at the maximum levels, when I win the Election, and become President of the United States!”
Search results that include critical news coverage are not a crime. Promising to prosecute a company over the news people can find about him was one of more than 100 threats NPR counted during the campaign to punish perceived enemies — a preview of the second term.
Sources: The Hill ↗ · NPR ↗ · Axios ↗
2025

January 20, 2025

On the ground

Trump On his first day back, Trump revokes the security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter about Hunter Biden’s laptop, and of his former national security adviser John Bolton

Signers included former CIA directors John Brennan and Leon Panetta and former DNI James Clapper. The order also asked for a report on “inappropriate activity” connected to the letter.

Stripping clearances over a public letter and a critical book punishes former officials for speech.

On the ground

Less than three hours after Trump takes office, the portrait of retired Gen. Mark Milley, the former Joint Chiefs chairman who called Trump “a fascist to the core,” is removed from a Pentagon hallway

Incoming Pentagon officials gave no explanation. Biden had preemptively pardoned Milley hours earlier because of Trump’s threats against him.

It was one of the first acts of the new administration, a symbolic purge of a general who had criticized Trump.

January 24, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump ends Dr. Anthony Fauci’s federal security detail despite years of death threats, then says he would feel no responsibility if anything happened to him

Biden had repeatedly renewed Fauci’s protection because of threats. Trump said, “You can’t have a security detail for the rest of your life because you worked for government.” Fauci hired private security.

“You can’t have a security detail for the rest of your life because you worked for government.”
Removing protection from a man under credible threat, and disclaiming responsibility, is retaliation that puts a life at risk.

January 27, 2025

The Justice Department fires at least a dozen prosecutors from special counsel Jack Smith's Trump cases

In the administration’s first week, the Justice Department fired at least a dozen officials who had worked on special counsel Jack Smith’s two prosecutions of Trump, with the acting attorney general saying they could not be trusted to implement the president’s agenda. Smith himself had resigned days earlier. Over the following months the FBI also fired agents who had worked the cases.

Dismantling the prosecutors and agents who built the cases was the opening move in a broader campaign against everyone associated with investigating the president.

January 28, 2025

On the ground

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revokes retired Gen. Mark Milley’s security detail and clearance and orders the inspector general to review whether he should be demoted

The Pentagon said “undermining the chain of command is corrosive to our national security.” Biden’s preemptive pardon covered criminal prosecution but not administrative action on Milley’s rank.

Pulling a retired general’s protection and moving to strip his rank because of his conduct toward Trump is political retribution.

January 31, 2025

On the ground

The Trump Justice Department fires about two dozen prosecutors hired to handle January 6 Capitol riot cases and orders the FBI to list every agent who worked on January 6 or Trump investigations — thousands of people — for possible firing

A memo dated January 31, 2025 directed then-interim D.C. U.S. Attorney Ed Martin to fire probationary prosecutors assigned to Capitol riot cases; none was accused of wrongdoing. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove ordered the FBI to compile the names of all current and former employees assigned “at any time” to the January 6 investigation, and eight FBI executives were ordered out. The acting FBI director said the request covered thousands of employees.

The January 6 investigation was the largest in FBI history, into a violent attack on Congress. Purging the people who worked it — days after Trump pardoned the rioters — tells every prosecutor and agent that investigating the president’s side can end their career, which is the opposite of equal justice.
Cross-posted · also in: Capturing the Justice Department

February 5, 2025

On the ground

On her first day as attorney general, Pam Bondi creates a “Weaponization Working Group” to review Jack Smith’s prosecutions of Trump, the New York cases against him, and the January 6 prosecutions — reporting quarterly to the White House

Bondi’s February 5, 2025 memo listed the special counsel’s cases, the Manhattan prosecution and Letitia James’s civil fraud case among its targets, along with “improper investigative tactics” in January 6 cases. The group was later run by Ed Martin, who said it would publicly “name and shame” people it could not charge.

A unit created to investigate the investigators of the president — reporting to the White House — inverts the purpose of the Justice Department. Its targets were defined not by evidence of crimes but by their role in holding Trump accountable.
Sources: NPR ↗ · ABC News ↗ · CNN ↗

February 20, 2025

On the ground

Acting D.C. U.S. Attorney Ed Martin sends a letter to Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia suggesting his call to bring “actual weapons to this bar fight” in opposing Elon Musk sounds “like a threat”

Garcia had also mocked Musk at a DOGE subcommittee hearing. Martin asked him to respond by February 24. Garcia said, “No reasonable person would view my comments as a threat.”

A federal prosecutor treating a congressman’s figure of speech as a possible threat, on behalf of the president’s most powerful ally, is intimidation of political opposition.

February 25, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump suspends the security clearances of lawyers at the Washington firm Covington & Burling who represented former special counsel Jack Smith in his personal capacity

A presidential memo suspended clearances held by Peter Koski and all Covington lawyers and staff “who assisted former Special Counsel Jack Smith.” Covington said it represented Smith after it became apparent he would become the subject of a government investigation. It was the first of a series of orders punishing law firms for their clients and lawyers.

Everyone has a right to a lawyer, and lawyers cannot be punished for whom they represent. Retaliating against a firm for defending the prosecutor who charged the president is meant to make other lawyers afraid to take on clients the president dislikes.
Cross-posted · also in: Punishing the Law Firms

On the ground

Weeks into his tenure, FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly opens an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey over the bureau’s 2016 handling of the Trump campaign

Reports on February 25, 2025 said Patel had ordered a probe of Comey related to alleged surveillance of Trump’s 2016 campaign. Patel had published a book naming Comey among a list of “government gangsters” he said should be pursued.

Patel arrived with a published enemies list. An FBI director opening investigations into a predecessor the president has attacked for years, before any new evidence emerged, shows the bureau being pointed at targets chosen in advance.
Sources: Mediaite ↗ · WJLA ↗

March 17, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump revokes Secret Service protection for Joe Biden’s adult children, Hunter and Ashley, complaining about the number of agents on Hunter’s South Africa trip

Biden had extended their protection for six months before leaving office. Trump called the costs “ridiculous.”

The decision was announced on Truth Social as an attack on his predecessor’s family, not as part of any security review.
Sources: ABC News ↗ · Axios ↗

April 9, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump signs orders directing the Justice Department to investigate two former officials who contradicted him — Chris Krebs, who called the 2020 election “the most secure” in history, and Miles Taylor, the “Anonymous” author — and says Taylor is “guilty of treason”

The presidential memoranda revoked Krebs’s and Taylor’s security clearances and those of their associates, including at Krebs’s employer SentinelOne and at the University of Pennsylvania, where Taylor taught. The Krebs order called for a review of six years of the cybersecurity agency’s work. Signing Taylor’s order, Trump said: “I think he’s guilty of treason if you want to know the truth.” Krebs left his job; his Global Entry was later revoked.

“I think he’s guilty of treason if you want to know the truth.”
Krebs was fired in 2020 for telling the truth about the election; Taylor criticized Trump in writing. A president personally ordering criminal investigations of named private citizens for their speech — with no alleged crime identified — is what Taylor called it: unprecedented. It also punishes their employers, warning companies not to hire the president’s critics.

April 24, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump orders the Justice Department to investigate ActBlue, the Democrats’ main online fundraising platform, over alleged “straw” and foreign donations

ActBlue called it an “oppressive use of power.” Trump’s own campaign fundraising had faced similar complaints about donor practices.

Ordering a criminal investigation of the opposing party’s fundraising operation ahead of the midterms uses federal law enforcement against political rivals.
Cross-posted · also in: Continued Election Interference

May 3, 2025

On the ground

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard opens an intelligence-community investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci’s role in funding gain-of-function research and COVID origins

Her later document release did not show that Fauci hid COVID’s origins or committed a crime.

Turning the intelligence agencies against a retired public-health official the president’s base blames for the pandemic is political retribution. When Gabbard released the documents in 2026, CNN found they didn’t prove her claims.

May 8, 2025

Trump's housing-finance appointee refers New York AG Letitia James for mortgage-fraud prosecution

Bill Pulte, Trump’s appointee atop the Federal Housing Finance Agency, referred New York Attorney General Letitia James — whose office had won the civil fraud judgment against Trump — to the Justice Department, alleging she misrepresented properties to obtain better mortgage terms. The FBI opened a criminal investigation in May. James’s office called it political retaliation.

James had been one of Trump’s most prominent legal adversaries; the mortgage allegations became the vehicle for pursuing her.

May 13, 2025

In his own words

Ed Martin, newly named head of the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group, says that if he cannot charge people the administration targets, he will publicly “name and shame” them

Martin told reporters that some conduct might not be criminal but should still be exposed, and that he would use his position to identify people publicly. Longstanding Justice Department policy bars prosecutors from publicly disparaging people they do not charge.

Prosecutors have enormous power precisely because they speak for the government. Using that platform to brand uncharged people as wrongdoers — with no trial and no way to answer — is punishment without due process.
Sources: NBC News ↗ · CNN ↗

May 19, 2025

Officials cast a James Comey beach photo of seashells reading “86 47” as a threat against Trump

After Comey posted an Instagram photo of seashells arranged as “86 47” on May 15, administration officials cast it as a threat against the president. The Secret Service questioned him and the Department of Homeland Security opened an investigation. Comey deleted the post, saying he had meant it as a political message.

The seashell post would resurface a year later as the basis for Comey’s second indictment.

May 20, 2025

In his own words

Justice Department civil rights official Leo Terrell suggests Jill Biden could face criminal charges for “elder abuse” over her husband’s health

He posted it on social media after Joe Biden’s cancer diagnosis amid right-wing claims of a cover-up.

On the ground

The Justice Department opens a criminal investigation of Andrew Cuomo over his COVID nursing-home testimony, as he runs for New York mayor against Trump-friendly Eric Adams

The probe followed a referral from Republican Rep. James Comer. Cuomo said he was never told.

Opening a criminal case against a leading candidate in the race where Trump’s preferred incumbent was running, based on a partisan congressional referral, uses the Justice Department as a campaign tool.

June 4, 2025

On the ground

Trump Trump signs a memorandum ordering the attorney general and White House counsel to investigate Joe Biden’s aides over his use of an autopen, calling it “one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history”

The memo questions the validity of Biden’s pardons and executive actions signed by autopen and directs an inquiry into whether aides “conspired to deceive the public” about Biden’s mental state. Presidents of both parties have used autopens for decades.

Trump turned the Justice Department on his predecessor’s staff and laid groundwork to declare Biden’s pardons void.

June 10, 2025

On the ground

Attorney General Pam Bondi fires more Justice Department employees who worked on the two federal prosecutions of Trump, and then January 6 prosecutors — continuing a purge that would leave no one who investigated him

In June 2025 Bondi fired multiple employees involved in the Jack Smith prosecutions, and on June 27 at least three prosecutors who worked on Capitol riot cases, with letters saying they were “removed from federal service effective immediately.” In July she fired about 20 more tied to the Trump cases. By March 2026, the deputy attorney general boasted that everyone at the FBI and Justice Department who had investigated Trump was gone.

Firing career lawyers for the cases they were assigned is retaliation, and its purpose is deterrence: the next prosecutor who finds evidence against a powerful figure knows what it will cost.

On the ground

Rep. LaMonica McIver, a Democrat, is indicted on federal charges of assaulting immigration officers during a congressional oversight visit to a Newark ICE detention center — weeks after Trump pardoned roughly 1,500 January 6 defendants, including people who assaulted police

The charges stem from a May 9, 2025 scuffle outside Delaney Hall, where Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested after trying to join McIver and other members of Congress on an oversight visit; the trespassing charge against Baraka was dropped. Prosecutors allege McIver struck agents with her forearms. She pleaded not guilty and called it “a brazen attempt at political intimidation.” A judge declined to dismiss the charges. After the clash, DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said arresting Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez, who were also on the visit, was “definitely on the table.”

Members of Congress have a legal right to inspect immigration detention facilities. Whether McIver crossed a line is for a jury, but the contrast is stark: the same administration that freed people who beat police officers on January 6 is prosecuting a Democratic congresswoman over a shoving match during an oversight visit.
Cross-posted · also in: ICE Unleashed

July 8, 2025

The DOJ opens criminal investigations into former officials James Comey and John Brennan

The Justice Department confirmed it had opened criminal investigations into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan — both central to the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election — following a referral from CIA Director John Ratcliffe alleging possible false statements to Congress.

It was the first formal criminal step against the officials Trump blamed for the Russia investigation.

July 16, 2025

Maurene Comey, James Comey's daughter and a veteran Manhattan prosecutor, is fired without explanation

Maurene Comey — a veteran federal prosecutor in Manhattan who handled the Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Sean “Diddy” Combs cases — was fired with no stated reason beyond a reference to the president’s authority. She is James Comey’s daughter. In a message to colleagues she warned that firing a career prosecutor without cause would let fear seep into the decisions of those who remained.

“Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought.”
The retribution reached past the investigators themselves to a member of the family.

July 26, 2025

In his own words

Trump Trump calls for Beyoncé, Kamala Harris and others to be “prosecuted” over a nonexistent $11 million endorsement payment, falsely claiming it is “TOTALLY ILLEGAL” to pay for endorsements

Federal records show the Harris campaign paid Beyoncé’s production company $165,000 for event production costs, which the law requires campaigns to cover. There was no $11 million payment, and no federal law bans paying for endorsements. Trump had called for investigations of Harris’s celebrity endorsers since May.

A president demanding prosecution of a famous critic based on a claim that is false on its facts and wrong on the law shows how casually he treats the criminal system as a tool against people he dislikes.

July 27, 2025

In his own words

CIA Director John Ratcliffe suggests Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey could be indicted for the “Russia hoax,” saying “that’s why I’ve made the referrals”

On Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures, Ratcliffe said he had “no doubt” Clinton, Brennan and Clapper “conspired against President Trump” and argued statutes of limitations might not prevent charges. The 2017 intelligence finding that Russia interfered to help Trump had been upheld by multiple reviews, including the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee.

“That’s why I’ve made the referrals that I have.”
The CIA is barred from domestic law enforcement. Its director publicly predicting indictments of the president’s 2016 opponent and former intelligence chiefs puts the agency’s weight behind a political campaign to relitigate a settled finding.

August 1, 2025

A federal watchdog opens a Hatch Act investigation into former special counsel Jack Smith

The Office of Special Counsel — a small federal watchdog agency — opened a Hatch Act investigation into Jack Smith, alleging his prosecutions of Trump had been politically motivated, after a request from Sen. Tom Cotton. Records later showed the probe issued nearly 200 subpoenas seeking records on roughly 430 Republican individuals and entities.

The agency cannot bring criminal charges, but the investigation kept Smith under official scrutiny and could refer findings to the DOJ.
Sources: CNN ↗ · NBC News ↗

August 4, 2025

On the ground

Attorney General Bondi orders a grand jury investigation of Obama administration officials over the 2017 intelligence finding that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump — a question John Durham had already spent four years investigating

The move followed referrals from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who accused Obama officials of a “treasonous conspiracy.” CNN reported Gabbard’s claims misrepresented the intelligence; the declassified documents did not undercut the core 2017 findings. Prior reviews, including Republican-led ones and special counsel Durham’s, produced no such charges. The probe later became a “grand conspiracy” grand jury in Florida.

Re-investigating a matter already examined by a special counsel, inspectors general and a Republican Senate committee, because the president is unhappy with the result, uses grand juries as political theater — and puts former officials through the cost and fear of criminal exposure.

August 8, 2025

On the ground

The Justice Department subpoenas New York Attorney General Letitia James’s office over her civil fraud case against Trump and her case against the NRA, opening a grand jury investigation into whether she violated Trump’s civil rights

Subpoenas from the Northern District of New York, led by Trump appointee John Sarcone, sought records on James’s investigations of the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, with a grand jury in Albany examining possible “deprivation of rights.” Her lawyer called it “the most blatant and desperate example” of political retribution. A judge later disqualified Sarcone and blocked the subpoenas.

James won a court judgment that Trump committed fraud. Opening a criminal investigation of the official who won that case — on the theory that holding him accountable violated his rights — turns the justice system against the people who enforce the law.

August 12, 2025

On the ground

Four days into a mortgage-fraud probe of Letitia James, DOJ “weaponization” chief Ed Martin writes to her lawyer urging her to resign — then poses for photos outside her Brooklyn home

Martin’s August 12, 2025 letter said James would best serve “the good of the state and nation” by resigning “as an act of good faith.” Her lawyer Abbe Lowell replied that the demand violated Justice Department policies against using prosecutorial power for political ends. Martin later posted photos of himself in a trench coat outside James’s townhouse, which angered department leaders and contributed to his removal from the working group.

Demanding that an elected official of the other party resign in exchange for leniency is using a criminal investigation as political leverage — precisely what prosecutors are forbidden to do.
Sources: AP ↗ · CNN ↗ · CBS News ↗

August 14, 2025

On the ground

The White House posts a video of some 20 FBI agents and U.S. Marshals in tactical gear arresting Sean Dunn, a former Justice Department employee, for throwing a sandwich at a federal agent; a grand jury refuses to indict him on a felony

Dunn, an Air Force veteran, had called the agents “fascists” and shouted “I don’t want you in my city!” The video was titled “Nighttime Routine: Operation Make D.C. Safe Again Edition.”

Turning the arrest of a protester into a propaganda clip, and overcharging him until a grand jury refused, shows the D.C. takeover was a show aimed at dissenters.
Cross-posted · also in: Sending in the Troops

August 19, 2025

On the ground

At Trump’s direction, Tulsi Gabbard strips security clearances from 37 current and former intelligence officials, many who worked on the 2017 Russia assessment, and posts their names online, exposing an undercover CIA officer

Gabbard accused them of “politicization or weaponization of intelligence” without evidence. One name on the list she posted to X was a CIA officer working undercover on Russia; she had not consulted the agency. The next day she announced “ODNI 2.0,” cutting her office’s staff by more than 40% and folding the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which tracks foreign election interference.

Punishing analysts for an assessment the president dislikes tells the intelligence community to shade its findings, and exposing a covert officer endangers people and sources overseas.

August 21, 2025

A New York appeals court overturns the civil-fraud judgment Letitia James had won against Trump

A New York appeals court vacated the roughly half-billion-dollar penalty in the civil fraud case Letitia James had won against Trump, ruling the fine violated the Eighth Amendment’s bar on excessive fines, while leaving other nonmonetary penalties in place. The decision removed the financial heart of the case that had made James a top target — even as the criminal pursuit of her continued.

The civil judgment was the original grievance driving the campaign against James; its reversal did not slow that campaign.
Sources: CNBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · NBC News ↗

August 22, 2025

On the ground

The FBI searches the home and office of former national security adviser John Bolton, a prominent Trump critic, in a classified-documents probe begun under Biden — Bolton is indicted in October and in June 2026 pleads guilty to one count

The court-authorized searches revived an investigation that began before Trump took office; the FBI had cited a foreign hack of Bolton’s AOL account. Trump said he didn’t “want to know about it” while comparing it to the search of Mar-a-Lago. In October a Maryland grand jury indicted Bolton on 18 counts of transmitting or retaining national defense information. On June 26, 2026, he pleaded guilty to a single count of retaining national defense information.

Bolton’s guilty plea shows this case had real substance, and it should be recorded that way. The objection is the double standard: Trump’s own prosecution for keeping hundreds of classified documents and obstructing their return was dropped when he took office, while his critics face full prosecution for the same category of offense.

August 24, 2025

In his own words

Trump After Chris Christie criticizes him on ABC’s “This Week,” Trump suggests reopening the 2013 “Bridgegate” lane-closure scandal against him

Christie was never charged. Two of his aides were convicted, but the Supreme Court overturned those convictions in 2020.

““For the sake of JUSTICE, perhaps we should start looking at that very serious situation again?””
Threatening a critic with investigation hours after a TV appearance shows prosecution being used as payback for speech.

August 26, 2025

On the ground

Three times, a federal grand jury in Washington refuses to indict Sidney Reid on a felony charge of assaulting an FBI agent during Trump’s D.C. law-enforcement surge — part of a string of grand-jury rebukes to U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office

Reid was arrested in July while filming federal officers transferring detainees to ICE custody. Pirro’s office sought a felony indictment three times and was refused each time, then charged a misdemeanor. Grand juries also declined to indict the man who threw a sandwich at a federal agent; he was later acquitted. Grand juries almost never refuse prosecutors.

When ordinary citizens on a grand jury repeatedly refuse to approve charges, it signals that prosecutors are overcharging to serve a political show of force. The surge was sold as fighting crime; in court, it often could not survive the scrutiny of residents.

August 27, 2025

In his own words

Trump Trump says billionaire George Soros and his son “should be charged with RICO” for supporting protests — and in September a senior Justice Department official orders prosecutors nationwide to prepare investigations of Soros’s Open Society Foundations, listing charges up to material support for terrorism

Trump posted that Soros “and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests.” In September he said Soros “should be in jail.” Aakash Singh, an aide to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, then directed U.S. attorney’s offices to draft investigative plans targeting the foundations, citing possible charges from arson to wire fraud, RICO and material support for terrorism. Sen. Ted Cruz introduced a bill adding rioting to RICO predicates aimed at protest funders. Open Society called the claims “false” and “outrageous.”

“George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests.”
Funding lawful advocacy groups and protests is protected political activity. Turning the president’s grievance against a major opposition donor into a nationwide prosecution directive is using the Justice Department to attack the other party’s financing.
Cross-posted · also in: The Crackdown on the Left

September 15, 2025

On the ground

Fired prosecutor Maurene Comey sues the Trump administration, saying she was dismissed without cause — after an “Outstanding” review and a day after being asked to lead a major corruption case — because of who her father is

The suit says Comey, who prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell and Sean Combs, was fired by email “pursuant to Article II of the United States Constitution” with no other explanation after almost 10 years in the Southern District of New York. A federal judge later allowed the case to proceed over the Justice Department’s objection.

Firing a career prosecutor with a strong record because the president dislikes her father is retaliation by family association — and a warning to every government employee that the president’s grudges extend to their relatives.

In his own words

After an Office Depot employee refused to print flyers for a Charlie Kirk vigil, Attorney General Pam Bondi says on Fox News “we can prosecute you for that” — the Justice Department later says it is not pursuing a case

The employee in Portage, Michigan, was fired by the company after refusing a Republican Party order. Bondi said: “Businesses cannot discriminate. If you wanna go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.” A DOJ spokesperson later said the Civil Rights Division was not proceeding. The same week Bondi suggested prosecuting “hate speech,” then walked it back.

“We can prosecute you for that.”
The nation’s chief law-enforcement officer threatening a retail worker with prosecution on national television, over a dispute already handled by the employer, is intimidation. Political views are not a protected class under federal anti-discrimination law.
Cross-posted · also in: The Crackdown on the Left

On the ground

Ed Martin, head of Trump’s Justice Department “weaponization” group, sends Sandy Hook families’ lawyer a letter questioning retired FBI agent William Aldenberg’s role in the defamation case against Alex Jones and citing “criminal laws” on officials acting for personal benefit

Aldenberg, one of the first responders at Sandy Hook Elementary, where 20 children and six staff were killed, testified at Jones’ 2022 trial and was among the plaintiffs who won the billion-dollar verdict. Martin’s Sept. 15, 2025 letter referenced “criminal laws protecting the citizens from actions by government employees who may be acting for personal benefit.” Jones posted it as proof of a DOJ probe of “law-fare” against him. After Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche reportedly confronted Martin, he withdrew the request on Sept. 24, saying there was no investigation. Lawyer Christopher Mattei called it “bullying.”

A Justice Department official went after an FBI agent for testifying against a Trump ally who called a school massacre a hoax. The retraction came only after it became public.
Sources: AP ↗ · Reuters ↗ · CNN ↗

September 20, 2025

Trump Trump publicly orders AG Pam Bondi to prosecute Comey, James and other adversaries

In a Truth Social post addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, the president demanded immediate criminal action against former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Sen. Adam Schiff, declaring they were “guilty as hell” and that nothing was being done. Putting prosecutorial demands in writing collapsed the customary wall between the White House and Justice Department charging decisions.

“We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility.”
Within days the demand produced results: the U.S. attorney who resisted was gone, and a presidential aide with no prosecutorial experience was in his place.
Sources: NBC News ↗ · CNN ↗

September 22, 2025

The U.S. attorney who declined to charge Comey or James is replaced with a Trump loyalist

Erik Siebert, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was pushed out after his office concluded there was insufficient evidence to charge Comey or James. The president installed Lindsey Halligan — a former personal lawyer and White House aide who had never worked as a prosecutor — as interim U.S. Attorney. Within days she personally secured the indictments her predecessor had declined to bring.

Halligan’s appointment would later prove to be the cases’ fatal flaw.
Sources: CBS News ↗ · Time ↗ · CNN ↗
Cross-posted · also in: Capturing the Justice Department

September 23, 2025

On the ground

Attorney General Bondi fires Miami federal prosecutor Will Rosenzweig within three hours of a conservative commentator publicizing his long-defunct personal blog that criticized Trump in 2017

Rosenzweig was two weeks from trying a multimillion-dollar Medicare fraud case and was observing Rosh Hashanah with his family when the firing email, signed by Bondi, arrived. The blog, defunct for more than six years, mostly covered travel and sports. He sued in 2026 seeking reinstatement.

Career prosecutors are entitled to political opinions they expressed as private citizens years before. Firing them on the say-so of online activists turns the Justice Department into an enforcer of loyalty to one man — and cost taxpayers the prosecutor on a major fraud case.

September 25, 2025

A grand jury indicts former FBI Director James Comey over his congressional testimony

A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted Comey on two counts — making a false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding — tied to his September 2020 Senate testimony about the FBI’s Russia investigation. The charges were filed days before the five-year statute of limitations expired, brought by Halligan within days of taking over the office.

DOJ prosecutors later admitted the grand jury never saw the final version of the indictment it supposedly approved.
Sources: CNN ↗ · Time ↗ · NBC News ↗
Cross-posted · also in: The Roy Cohn Playbook

September 26, 2025

In his own words

Trump A day after James Comey’s indictment, Trump demands Microsoft fire its global affairs president, former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, calling her a national-security threat and citing Microsoft’s federal contracts

On Sept. 26, 2025, Trump posted that Monaco “has been shockingly hired as the President of Global Affairs for Microsoft, in a very senior role with access to Highly Sensitive Information. Monaco’s having that kind of access is unacceptable, and cannot be allowed to stand.” He wrote that Microsoft “should immediately terminate the employment of Lisa Monaco.” Her security clearances had been revoked in February, and Trump said she had been barred from all federal property. The demand rattled Washington’s lobbying industry.

“It is my opinion that Microsoft should immediately terminate the employment of Lisa Monaco.”
Monaco helped oversee the January 6 prosecutions. Pressuring a federal contractor to fire her extends Trump’s retribution campaign into private employment, and warns every company that hiring his perceived enemies has a price.

October 1, 2025

On the ground

The Justice Department fires Michael Ben’Ary, chief of national security prosecutions in Eastern Virginia and lead prosecutor in the Abbey Gate bombing case, hours after a pro-Trump writer falsely suggested online that he resisted indicting Comey

Writer Julie Kelly posted that the public “can only assume” Ben’Ary was part of “internal resistance” to the Comey indictment. He had no role in the case. Ben’Ary, who was prosecuting an alleged plotter of the 2021 Kabul airport attack that killed 13 U.S. service members, taped a letter to his office door saying department leaders were “more concerned” with pursuing the president’s perceived enemies than protecting the country.

Removing the prosecutor handling a terror case that killed American troops, on the strength of a false social-media post, shows loyalty policing overriding national security in the Justice Department.

October 3, 2025

On the ground

An FBI agent is suspended and then fired for refusing to take part in a planned “perp walk” of indicted former FBI Director James Comey — and Director Kash Patel posts “follow the chain of command or get relieved”

CBS and others reported the FBI weighed a public arrest and perp walk for Comey, which is highly unusual for a white-collar defendant who had agreed to appear. An agent who objected was suspended for insubordination and later fired. The court instead issued a summons, and no perp walk took place.

“In this @fbi, follow the chain of command or get relieved.”
Perp walks are designed to humiliate. Planning one for a 64-year-old former FBI director who posed no flight risk served only the president’s wish to see his enemy paraded — and punishing an agent who refused shows the FBI demanding personal loyalty over professional judgment.

October 7, 2025

On the ground

FBI Director Kash Patel fires agents who worked on Jack Smith’s investigation of Trump and disbands the Washington public-corruption squad — boasting “You’re darn right I fired those agents”

The agents had been named in documents released by Sen. Chuck Grassley about “Arctic Frost,” the precursor to Smith’s cases, which obtained phone toll records of some members of Congress. Patel said on Fox News he “blew up CR-15, the public corruption squad.” About a dozen FBI staff who worked on the Mar-a-Lago documents case were fired over two days later in the fall. Several fired agents filed a class action alleging a retribution campaign.

“You’re darn right I fired those agents; you’re darn right I blew up CR-15, the public corruption squad.”
Dismantling the squad that investigates public corruption, and firing agents for working a court-authorized investigation of the president, rewards the subject of the investigation and leaves official corruption with fewer people to stop it.

October 9, 2025

A grand jury indicts New York AG Letitia James on bank-fraud charges

Halligan’s office indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James — whose office had won a multimillion-dollar civil fraud judgment against Trump — on one count of bank fraud and one of making a false statement to a financial institution, alleging she misrepresented a property to obtain better mortgage terms. She pleaded not guilty at her October 24 arraignment and called the case political retribution.

James was the second of the president’s named targets to be charged within three weeks of his public demand.

October 23, 2025

On the ground

The mortgage-fraud investigation of Sen. Adam Schiff — who led Trump’s first impeachment — stalls as Maryland prosecutors find insufficient evidence to charge, despite pressure from Ed Martin

Bill Pulte, Trump’s housing-finance appointee, had referred Schiff for prosecution, as he did Letitia James and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook; mortgage fraud became the administration’s go-to allegation against foes. CNN reported Maryland prosecutors were hesitant to proceed. Asked about it, Trump said: “I hope it’s true, but I don’t know anything.” The Justice Department later opened a probe into how the Schiff investigation had been handled.

“I hope it’s true, but I don’t know anything.”
The same accusation surfacing against three of Trump’s prominent opponents, from the same appointee, is a pattern of manufactured cases. When career prosecutors find no crime, the response has been to pressure or replace them.

On the ground

A federal grand jury indicts Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh and five others, including two other local candidates, on conspiracy and impeding charges over a protest that blocked an ICE agent’s car outside the Broadview, Illinois, facility

Prosecutors allege the group surrounded and banged on an agent’s vehicle on September 26 during “Operation Midway Blitz,” scratching it and breaking a mirror. Abughazaleh, running in Illinois’s 9th District, called it an “attempt by the Trump administration to criminalize protest.” A judge later dismissed the conspiracy charge against the “Broadview Six.”

Property damage can be prosecuted. But charging protest as a federal conspiracy — against political candidates of the opposing party, during an election campaign — inflates a confrontation into a felony case, and the conspiracy count did not survive.
Cross-posted · also in: The Crackdown on the Left

October 24, 2025

In his own words

Trump Trump demands the prosecution of “Deranged Jack Smith,” former Attorney General Merrick Garland, former FBI Director Christopher Wray and former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, calling them “Radical Left Lunatics”

Trump posted that documents showed Wray, Smith, Garland, Monaco “and other crooked lowlifes” had signed off on the “Arctic Frost” investigation, which obtained phone records of nine Republican lawmakers, and wrote: “These Radical Left Lunatics should be prosecuted for their illegal and highly unethical behavior!” A month earlier he had demanded Microsoft fire Monaco, calling her “a menace.”

“These Radical Left Lunatics should be prosecuted for their illegal and highly unethical behavior!”
The people named were the officials who oversaw the lawful investigation of Trump himself. A president calling for prosecution of his own investigators converts the courts’ check on him into a crime by the checkers.

November 3, 2025

On the ground

Answering Comey’s motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution, the Justice Department defends Trump’s public demands to prosecute him as reflecting a “legitimate prosecutorial motive”

Comey’s lawyers submitted more than 60 pages of Trump’s public attacks, including his September post ordering Bondi to act. The department wrote: “These posts reflect the President’s view that the defendant has committed crimes that should be met with prosecution. They may even suggest that the President disfavors the defendant. But they are not direct evidence of a vindictive motive.” A magistrate judge soon accused prosecutors of an “indict first, investigate later” approach.

“They may even suggest that the President disfavors the defendant. But they are not direct evidence of a vindictive motive.”
The Justice Department arguing that the president openly demanding a named enemy’s prosecution is legitimate removes any pretense of independence. If those posts are not evidence of vindictiveness, nothing would be.

November 11, 2025

On the ground

A watchdog group files bar complaints in Virginia and Florida against Lindsey Halligan — Trump’s hand-picked prosecutor for Comey and James, who had never prosecuted a case — alleging false statements and charges unsupported by probable cause

The Campaign for Accountability asked both state bars to investigate whether Halligan, a former insurance lawyer and White House aide, violated professional-conduct rules and was unfit to practice. It renewed the complaint in February 2026 after courts ruled against her. In February 2026 the Florida Bar wrote that it already had an investigation pending, then said in March that there was no pending investigation.

Prosecutors are bound by ethics rules because they hold the power to ruin lives. A political loyalist with no prosecutorial experience, installed specifically to charge the president’s enemies, is exactly the risk those rules exist to guard against.

November 17, 2025

On the ground

Rep. Jamie Raskin says a whistleblower accuses Ed Martin, head of the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group, of using disappearing messages and personal devices to conceal and destroy records of the group’s work

In a mid-November letter, the House Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat said credible allegations indicated Martin was “violating federal law by concealing and destroying” communications to hide the group’s activities. The watchdog American Oversight sued the department for records on Martin.

Federal records laws exist so that the public can later see how power was used. A unit built to investigate the president’s opponents operating through auto-deleting messages is designed to escape exactly that accountability.

November 19, 2025

On the ground

Lindsey Halligan admits in court that the full grand jury never saw the final indictment of James Comey — after jurors rejected one count, she had only the foreperson and one other juror sign a revised version

At a hearing before Judge Michael Nachmanoff, prosecutors conceded that after the grand jury declined one of three proposed charges, Halligan brought an altered indictment to the magistrate’s courtroom to be signed rather than presenting it to the full panel. Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick had already found her grand-jury presentation may have included privileged material or misstated the law, citing a “disturbing pattern” of missteps.

The Fifth Amendment requires that serious federal charges come from a grand jury. A prosecutor rushing a politically demanded case past a deadline, and skipping that safeguard, shows what happens when loyalty replaces competence and process.

November 20, 2025

In his own words

Trump Trump calls a video in which six Democratic lawmakers who served in the military or intelligence remind troops they can refuse illegal orders “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” and reposts a call to “HANG THEM”

In the 90-second video, Sens. Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin and Reps. Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander and Chrissy Houlahan told service members they can refuse illegal orders. On Nov. 20, 2025, Trump called it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” and wrote that each of the “traitors” should be “ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL.” He reposted more than a dozen comments, including one reading “HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!” Stephen Miller called the video “insurrection.” Speaker Mike Johnson said Trump was merely “defining a crime.”

“SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!”
The lawmakers restated military law: troops must refuse unlawful orders. The president said that was a capital crime and amplified a call to hang them. The lawmakers said “no threat, intimidation, or call for violence will deter us.”
Sources: AP ↗ · NBC News ↗ · NPR ↗ · CNN ↗
Cross-posted · also in: Strongman Talk

November 24, 2025

A judge throws out the Comey and James indictments as unlawful

U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed the indictments against both Comey and James, ruling that Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. Attorney had been unlawful and that everything flowing from it was invalid. The dismissals were without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of re-charging.

“All actions flowing from Ms. Halligan’s defective appointment … were unlawful exercises of executive power and are hereby set aside.”
The cases collapsed not on the facts but on the administration’s own shortcut around the law in installing the prosecutor who brought them.
Sources: CNN ↗ · CBS News ↗

On the ground

The Pentagon announces it is investigating Sen. Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, over the “illegal orders” video and threatens to recall him to active duty for court-martial, and the FBI’s counterterrorism division opens an inquiry into all six lawmakers

The Pentagon’s Nov. 24, 2025 statement said Kelly’s words may have interfered with the “loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces” and that its review “may include recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings.” The next day, Sen. Elissa Slotkin said the FBI’s counterterrorism division had notified the six lawmakers it was opening what appeared to be an inquiry; she called it a “scare tactic.” On Jan. 5, 2026, Hegseth formally censured Kelly as “a necessary process step” toward demoting him from his retired rank and cutting his retirement pay. On Feb. 12, 2026, a federal judge blocked the punishment, ruling that the Pentagon had “trampled” on Kelly’s First Amendment rights.

Kelly, a former combat pilot and astronaut, was one of six Democratic lawmakers in the video, which Trump had called “seditious behavior, punishable by death.” The Pentagon threatening a sitting senator with court-martial for reminding troops of the law is unprecedented, and a court said so.

November 25, 2025

On the ground

A day after a judge rules Lindsey Halligan was unlawfully appointed and throws out the Comey and James cases, the Justice Department keeps signing new indictments in her name, calling the ruling “premature”

Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia were first told to sign filings in the name of Halligan’s first assistant, then an hour later instructed by internal email to keep using Halligan’s name. Halligan left the office in January 2026 after further court orders.

When a court rules someone holds office illegally, the government complies or appeals — it does not ignore the ruling. Continuing to act through an official a judge has said has no authority is defiance of the courts.

December 4, 2025

A grand jury refuses to re-indict Letitia James after her case is dismissed

After the dismissal, the Justice Department sought a fresh indictment of James — and a federal grand jury declined to return one. It was a rare rebuke; grand juries almost always indict when prosecutors ask them to.

The refusal undercut the administration’s claim that the case rested on evidence rather than political direction.
2026

January 14, 2026

On the ground

FBI agents search the Virginia home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who covers Trump’s transformation of the federal government, and seize her phone and watch in a leak investigation in which she is not a target

FBI agents search the Virginia home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who covers Trump’s transformation of the federal government, and seize her phone and watch in a leak investigation in which she is not a target. The probe concerns a Maryland system administrator accused of taking home classified reports. Press freedom groups called searching a reporter’s home a highly unusual escalation.

Cross-posted · also in: Attacks on the Free Press

January 20, 2026

On the ground

Federal prosecutors serve grand jury subpoenas on Gov. Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and other Minnesota officials, investigating whether their public statements obstructed the immigration crackdown

Federal prosecutors serve grand jury subpoenas on Gov. Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her and county officials. The investigation is into whether their public statements obstructed the immigration crackdown, under a conspiracy statute. One subpoena sought “any records tending to show a refusal to come to the aid of immigration officials.” Walz and Frey called it a bullying tactic.

Cross-posted · also in: ICE Unleashed

January 22, 2026

Jack Smith is hauled before House Republicans as Trump demands his prosecution

Former special counsel Jack Smith — who had brought the federal classified-documents and January 6 cases against Trump — testified publicly before the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee, which had subpoenaed him in October and deposed him behind closed doors in December. Smith testified that the decision to charge Trump was his alone and rested on Trump’s own conduct. As he testified, the president called for Smith himself to be criminally prosecuted.

“Based on his testimony today, there is no question that Deranged Jack Smith should be prosecuted for his actions.”
With the Comey and James indictments already thrown out, the campaign turned to the prosecutor who had built the cases against the president.

February 10, 2026

On the ground

A federal grand jury in Washington refuses to indict six Democratic lawmakers — including Sens. Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin — whom Jeanine Pirro’s office sought to charge over a video reminding troops they may refuse illegal orders; Trump had called the video “punishable by death”

Pirro’s office sought charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2387, which punishes urging insubordination in the military, against Kelly, Slotkin and Reps. Jason Crow, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander and Chris Deluzio, all military or intelligence veterans. Their video restated the long-established principle that service members must refuse unlawful orders. Trump had called it “seditious behavior, punishable by death.” After the grand jury refused, the office shelved the effort.

Telling troops to follow the law is not a crime; it is what military law requires. Seeking prison for members of Congress over it — after the president called for their execution — is an attempt to criminalize opposition speech, and a grand jury of ordinary citizens recognized it.

February 23, 2026

Judge Aileen Cannon permanently blocks release of Jack Smith's classified-documents report

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon — the Trump appointee who had dismissed the classified-documents prosecution — permanently blocked release of the second volume of Smith’s report on that case, granting requests from Trump and two co-defendants. The volume covered the documents investigation the public was never allowed to see.

Cannon would also preside over the grand jury in the broader “grand conspiracy” probe weeks later.

March 12, 2026

The DOJ convenes a “grand conspiracy” grand jury and subpoenas James Comey

DOJ’s Southern District of Florida — before Judge Aileen Cannon, the lone judge at the Fort Pierce courthouse — convened a grand jury for a sweeping “grand conspiracy” investigation alleging that Comey, Brennan and other former officials conspired against Trump from 2016 onward. It has issued more than 130 subpoenas, including one to Comey, and the department removed a national-security section chief who resisted, installing Trump loyalist Joseph diGenova.

The probe tied the disparate cases together into a single theory of a years-long plot — venued before the judge most favorable to Trump. The diGenova appointment also appears in the Installing Loyalists thread.

March 25, 2026

Trump's housing appointee files fresh fraud referrals against Letitia James

Four months after the case against her was dismissed, Bill Pulte filed new criminal referrals against James — this time alleging homeowners-insurance fraud — directed to two Trump-appointed U.S. attorneys in Florida and Illinois. Her counsel called it a continuing political vendetta.

Like Comey’s second indictment a month later, it showed the campaign restarting after the courts shut down the first attempt.
Sources: CNN ↗ · HousingWire ↗

The DOJ's document release meant to discredit Jack Smith instead exposes evidence against Trump

In handing records to House Republicans to discredit Smith, the Justice Department disclosed a January 2023 internal memo revealing that prosecutors had evidence Trump took a document so sensitive only six people in the government were cleared to see it — and that Susie Wiles had witnessed Trump showing a classified map to others on his plane. The effort to bury the case instead surfaced some of its most damaging findings.

The disclosure undercut the premise that the documents prosecution had been baseless.
Sources: CNN ↗ · Axios ↗ · UPI ↗

April 15, 2026

On the ground

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard sends criminal referrals to the Justice Department for the whistleblower and the intelligence inspector general whose 2019 complaint about Trump’s Ukraine call led to his first impeachment

Gabbard claimed “deep state actors” had “concocted a false narrative” to impeach Trump, without providing evidence of any crime. The whistleblower had reported Trump’s request that Ukraine’s president investigate Joe Biden — a call whose rough transcript the White House itself released. Rep. Jim Himes said the referral “will amount to nothing because no misconduct occurred” but will chill future whistleblowers.

Federal law protects intelligence whistleblowers who report concerns to the inspector general and Congress through proper channels, as this one did. Seeking to prosecute them years later tells every future whistleblower that reporting presidential misconduct can make them a criminal target.

April 17, 2026

On the ground

The Justice Department removes the career prosecutor leading the criminal investigation of former CIA Director John Brennan after she doubted there was enough evidence to charge him — and installs Trump loyalist Joe diGenova

Maria Medetis Long, a Miami federal prosecutor, told defense lawyers she was off the case after resisting pressure to bring quick charges over Brennan’s congressional testimony about the 2017 Russia assessment. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche brought in diGenova, who represented Trump’s campaign in its failed effort to overturn the 2020 election. A former U.S. attorney called the removal “extremely unusual.” The prosecutor who later led the broader “grand conspiracy” probe resigned without charging anyone.

Replacing a prosecutor because she will not charge without evidence, and putting a partisan loyalist in her place, is the clearest sign that the outcome was decided before the investigation.

April 28, 2026

A grand jury indicts James Comey a second time, over his Instagram post

Six months after his first case was thrown out, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina indicted Comey again — this time on two counts of threatening the president under 18 U.S.C. § 871. The charge rested on a May 2025 Instagram post in which Comey shared a photo of seashells arranged to read “86 47,” which prosecutors cast as a threat against the 47th president. Comey had deleted the post, saying he had meant it as a political message and hadn’t realized the numbers were linked to violence. He faces up to 10 years.

“I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence.”
The first indictment collapsed because the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed. Rather than drop the matter, the department found a new charge, a new district, and a new grand jury to keep the case against Comey alive.
Sources: U.S. DOJ ↗ · CNN ↗ · NPR ↗

October 7, 2026

In his own words

Trump Asked if Democrats will impeach him, Trump says he “could have done very bad things” to Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and “Barack Hussein Obama,” and adds: “Even to this moment, I can do whatever I want, if I want.”

In the Oval Office on October 7, 2026, a reporter asked Trump what Democrats would impeach him for if they win Congress in the November 3 midterms. He answered by naming his predecessors and his 2016 opponent as people he could have gone after, and said he held back only because the presidency is “sacred” and must be treated “with respect.” “I’ve had my shot — and still do — at Joe Biden, at Hillary Clinton, at Barack Hussein Obama,” he said. “I’ve had plenty of people say let’s go get them.” He said “they” had done “many illegal things” but did not say what any of them had supposedly done. The restraint he described does not match his record. His Justice Department indicted former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both of whom had investigated him. Judges dismissed those cases, and Comey was then indicted a second time. Trump has called for charges against Sen. Adam Schiff, who led his first impeachment, and his Justice Department opened a probe of former Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

“I could have done very bad things to Hillary Clinton. I could have done very, very bad things to Joe Biden. I could have done very bad things to Barack Hussein Obama. I thought it was inappropriate to do so because you have to treat the office of the presidency with respect. Then I found out that they impeached me twice. And I certainly, even to this moment, I can do whatever I want, if I want. They’ve done some very bad things… What they did, very illegal. What they did, many illegal things. But I view the presidency as a very sacred position.”
TAKING IT APART

Who is "they"? He named Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Barack Obama, then said, "Then I found out that they impeached me twice." None of them did. Impeachment is a vote of the House of Representatives. The Democratic-led House impeached him in December 2019 for pressuring Ukraine to investigate Biden, and again in January 2021 for inciting the Capitol riot. Obama and Clinton were private citizens both times. Biden was the target of the first and president-elect during the second. The Senate acquitted him both times. In one sentence he merged three political opponents and the House into a single enemy called "they."

What illegal things? "Very illegal." "Many illegal things." "Some very bad things." He named no act, no law, no date and no evidence. When pressed, he pointed back at the reporter's question about his own impeachment as if it were proof.

"Even to this moment, I can do whatever I want, if I want." Under long-standing norms, the Justice Department decides whom to prosecute, based on evidence. He described prosecuting his opponents as his personal option, still open. The reason he gave for holding back was not the law or a lack of evidence. It was "respect," followed in the next breath by a grievance: they impeached him.

"Very sacred." He called the presidency "very sacred," twice, in the same answer where he said he can do whatever he wants.

This is the pattern: a threat, a grievance, an accusation with nothing behind it, then a claim of restraint. It is a vindictive man telling his opponents that what happens to them depends on his mood.
Cross-posted · also in: Strongman Talk, The Obama Fixation