A Democracy Drive Thread

The Revenge Prosecutions

Turning the Justice Department against the people who investigated and prosecuted him — indictments brought by a loyalist with no prosecutorial experience, then thrown out as unlawful.

After returning to office, the president directed the machinery of federal law enforcement at the very people who had investigated or prosecuted him — former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and former special counsel Jack Smith. This thread tracks that campaign in chronological order, with sources: the public demands for prosecution, the removal of a U.S. attorney who declined to bring charges and his replacement with a loyalist, the indictments that followed, and the courts and grand juries that threw them out. The entries are presented in order so the sequence speaks for itself.

19 entries Jan 2025Apr 2026 Every entry is sourced & links back to the archive.
2025

January 27, 2025

The purge of Jack Smith’s team begins

In the administration’s first week, the Justice Department fired at least a dozen officials who had worked on special counsel Jack Smith’s two prosecutions of Trump, with the acting attorney general saying they could not be trusted to implement the president’s agenda. Smith himself had resigned days earlier. Over the following months the FBI also fired agents who had worked the cases.

Dismantling the prosecutors and agents who built the cases was the opening move in a broader campaign against everyone associated with investigating the president.

May 8, 2025

The mortgage case against Letitia James opens

Bill Pulte, Trump’s appointee atop the Federal Housing Finance Agency, referred New York Attorney General Letitia James — whose office had won the civil fraud judgment against Trump — to the Justice Department, alleging she misrepresented properties to obtain better mortgage terms. The FBI opened a criminal investigation in May. James’s office called it political retaliation.

James had been one of Trump’s most prominent legal adversaries; the mortgage allegations became the vehicle for pursuing her.

May 19, 2025

Comey is investigated over a beach photo

After Comey posted an Instagram photo of seashells arranged as “86 47” on May 15, administration officials cast it as a threat against the president. The Secret Service questioned him and the Department of Homeland Security opened an investigation. Comey deleted the post, saying he had meant it as a political message.

The seashell post would resurface a year later as the basis for Comey’s second indictment.

July 8, 2025

DOJ opens criminal investigations into Comey and Brennan

The Justice Department confirmed it had opened criminal investigations into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan — both central to the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election — following a referral from CIA Director John Ratcliffe alleging possible false statements to Congress.

It was the first formal criminal step against the officials Trump blamed for the Russia investigation.

July 16, 2025

His daughter is fired too

Maurene Comey — a veteran federal prosecutor in Manhattan who handled the Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Sean “Diddy” Combs cases — was fired with no stated reason beyond a reference to the president’s authority. She is James Comey’s daughter. In a message to colleagues she warned that firing a career prosecutor without cause would let fear seep into the decisions of those who remained.

“Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought.”
The retribution reached past the investigators themselves to a member of the family.

August 1, 2025

A watchdog opens an investigation into Jack Smith

The Office of Special Counsel — a small federal watchdog agency — opened a Hatch Act investigation into Jack Smith, alleging his prosecutions of Trump had been politically motivated, after a request from Sen. Tom Cotton. Records later showed the probe issued nearly 200 subpoenas seeking records on roughly 430 Republican individuals and entities.

The agency cannot bring criminal charges, but the investigation kept Smith under official scrutiny and could refer findings to the DOJ.
Sources: CNN ↗ · NBC News ↗

August 21, 2025

The judgment that started it is overturned

A New York appeals court vacated the roughly half-billion-dollar penalty in the civil fraud case Letitia James had won against Trump, ruling the fine violated the Eighth Amendment’s bar on excessive fines, while leaving other nonmonetary penalties in place. The decision removed the financial heart of the case that had made James a top target — even as the criminal pursuit of her continued.

The civil judgment was the original grievance driving the campaign against James; its reversal did not slow that campaign.
Sources: CNBC ↗ · NPR ↗ · NBC News ↗

September 20, 2025

Trump Trump publicly orders the prosecution of his adversaries

In a Truth Social post addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, the president demanded immediate criminal action against former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Sen. Adam Schiff, declaring they were “guilty as hell” and that nothing was being done. Putting prosecutorial demands in writing collapsed the customary wall between the White House and Justice Department charging decisions.

“We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility.”
Within days the demand produced results: the U.S. attorney who resisted was gone, and a presidential aide with no prosecutorial experience was in his place.
Sources: NBC News ↗ · CNN ↗

September 22, 2025

The prosecutor who wouldn’t charge is replaced by a loyalist

Erik Siebert, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was pushed out after his office concluded there was insufficient evidence to charge Comey or James. The president installed Lindsey Halligan — a former personal lawyer and White House aide who had never worked as a prosecutor — as interim U.S. Attorney. Within days she personally secured the indictments her predecessor had declined to bring.

Halligan’s appointment would later prove to be the cases’ fatal flaw.
Sources: CBS News ↗ · Time ↗ · CNN ↗

September 25, 2025

James Comey is indicted

A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted Comey on two counts — making a false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding — tied to his September 2020 Senate testimony about the FBI’s Russia investigation. The charges were filed days before the five-year statute of limitations expired, brought by Halligan within days of taking over the office.

DOJ prosecutors later admitted the grand jury never saw the final version of the indictment it supposedly approved.
Sources: CNN ↗ · Time ↗ · NBC News ↗

October 9, 2025

Letitia James is indicted

Halligan’s office indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James — whose office had won a multimillion-dollar civil fraud judgment against Trump — on one count of bank fraud and one of making a false statement to a financial institution, alleging she misrepresented a property to obtain better mortgage terms. She pleaded not guilty at her October 24 arraignment and called the case political retribution.

James was the second of the president’s named targets to be charged within three weeks of his public demand.

November 24, 2025

A judge throws out both cases as unlawful

U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed the indictments against both Comey and James, ruling that Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. Attorney had been unlawful and that everything flowing from it was invalid. The dismissals were without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of re-charging.

“All actions flowing from Ms. Halligan’s defective appointment … were unlawful exercises of executive power and are hereby set aside.”
The cases collapsed not on the facts but on the administration’s own shortcut around the law in installing the prosecutor who brought them.
Sources: CNN ↗ · CBS News ↗

December 4, 2025

A grand jury refuses to re-indict Letitia James

After the dismissal, the Justice Department sought a fresh indictment of James — and a federal grand jury declined to return one. It was a rare rebuke; grand juries almost always indict when prosecutors ask them to.

The refusal undercut the administration’s claim that the case rested on evidence rather than political direction.
2026

January 22, 2026

Jack Smith is hauled before Congress, and Trump demands his prosecution

Former special counsel Jack Smith — who had brought the federal classified-documents and January 6 cases against Trump — testified publicly before the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee, which had subpoenaed him in October and deposed him behind closed doors in December. Smith testified that the decision to charge Trump was his alone and rested on Trump’s own conduct. As he testified, the president called for Smith himself to be criminally prosecuted.

“Based on his testimony today, there is no question that Deranged Jack Smith should be prosecuted for his actions.”
With the Comey and James indictments already thrown out, the campaign turned to the prosecutor who had built the cases against the president.

February 23, 2026

Cannon blocks Smith’s classified-documents report

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon — the Trump appointee who had dismissed the classified-documents prosecution — permanently blocked release of the second volume of Smith’s report on that case, granting requests from Trump and two co-defendants. The volume covered the documents investigation the public was never allowed to see.

Cannon would also preside over the grand jury in the broader “grand conspiracy” probe weeks later.

March 12, 2026

The “grand conspiracy” probe — and a subpoena for Comey

DOJ’s Southern District of Florida — before Judge Aileen Cannon, the lone judge at the Fort Pierce courthouse — convened a grand jury for a sweeping “grand conspiracy” investigation alleging that Comey, Brennan and other former officials conspired against Trump from 2016 onward. It has issued more than 130 subpoenas, including one to Comey, and the department removed a national-security section chief who resisted, installing Trump loyalist Joseph diGenova.

The probe tied the disparate cases together into a single theory of a years-long plot — venued before the judge most favorable to Trump. The diGenova appointment also appears in the Installing Loyalists thread.

March 25, 2026

A fresh criminal referral for Letitia James

Four months after the case against her was dismissed, Bill Pulte filed new criminal referrals against James — this time alleging homeowners-insurance fraud — directed to two Trump-appointed U.S. attorneys in Florida and Illinois. Her counsel called it a continuing political vendetta.

Like Comey’s second indictment a month later, it showed the campaign restarting after the courts shut down the first attempt.
Sources: CNN ↗ · HousingWire ↗

The anti-Smith campaign backfires

In handing records to House Republicans to discredit Smith, the Justice Department disclosed a January 2023 internal memo revealing that prosecutors had evidence Trump took a document so sensitive only six people in the government were cleared to see it — and that Susie Wiles had witnessed Trump showing a classified map to others on his plane. The effort to bury the case instead surfaced some of its most damaging findings.

The disclosure undercut the premise that the documents prosecution had been baseless.
Sources: CNN ↗ · Axios ↗ · UPI ↗

April 28, 2026

Comey is indicted a second time — over an Instagram post

Six months after his first case was thrown out, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina indicted Comey again — this time on two counts of threatening the president under 18 U.S.C. § 871. The charge rested on a May 2025 Instagram post in which Comey shared a photo of seashells arranged to read “86 47,” which prosecutors cast as a threat against the 47th president. Comey had deleted the post, saying he had meant it as a political message and hadn’t realized the numbers were linked to violence. He faces up to 10 years.

“I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence.”
The first indictment collapsed because the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed. Rather than drop the matter, the department found a new charge, a new district, and a new grand jury to keep the case against Comey alive.
Sources: U.S. DOJ ↗ · CNN ↗ · NPR ↗